Gold And Silver Slide As Oil Rises And US Stocks Retreat
Gold, silver and US stocks ended below their recent averages on Friday, while WTI crude held above both, TradingView data shows.

December gold futures (GCZ2026) fell 3.29% to $3,898.90 an ounce on 30th October, while December silver futures (SIZ2026) lost 5.93% to $49.28. December West Texas Intermediate crude oil futures (CLZ2026) rose 2.08% to $104.12 a barrel. The Nasdaq Composite (IXIC) dropped 2.86%, completing a session in which oil advanced as precious metals and US shares retreated.
The divide extended beyond one day's direction. Both oil contracts examined here stood above their 20 and 50 session averages. Gold, silver and all three share indices were below both. Bored Node's assessment of those readings gives oil the stronger trend position, while the metals face nearer tests of Friday's lows.
The Daily Charts Show An Uneven Market
This snapshot uses TradingView's completed daily bars, retrieved between 08:40 and 08:42 UTC on 31st October. Commodity closes use settlement prices, which can differ from the final trade. These are fixed delivery contracts, with January 2027 used for Brent, alongside cash share indices. They are session comparisons, not simultaneous Saturday quotations.
| Market And Feed | Close | Daily Change | 20 Session Average | 50 Session Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gold, COMEX:GCZ2026 | $3,898.90/oz | −3.29% | $4,115.04 | $4,294.80 |
| Silver, COMEX:SIZ2026 | $49.28/oz | −5.93% | $57.01 | $62.24 |
| WTI, NYMEX:CLZ2026 | $104.12/barrel | +2.08% | $96.41 | $91.04 |
| Brent, NYMEX:BZF2027 | $113.43/barrel | +2.37% | $105.35 | $97.45 |
| S&P 500, SP:SPX | 7,580.07 | −1.82% | 7,729.90 | 7,697.08 |
| Nasdaq Composite, NASDAQ:IXIC | 25,437.00 | −2.86% | 26,675.65 | 26,574.14 |
| Dow Jones Industrial Average, DJ:DJI | 51,770.31 | −1.09% | 51,995.31 | 52,211.42 |
The simple moving averages give equal weight to each session's close. They describe the recent price trend and move as new sessions enter the calculation. The levels below are our own conditional assessment using Friday's observed highs and lows as the nearest boundaries, then the recorded averages as further reference points.

Gold And Silver Face Recovery Tests Above Friday's Lows
Gold's daily bar opened at $4,033.60, had a high of $4,038.20 and a low of $3,879.30, and settled at $3,898.90. Closing near the bottom of that range leaves $3,879.30 as the first support reference, meaning a level at which a recovery would need to hold. It does not establish that buyers will defend it.
A daily close below that low would strengthen the case for a further decline. A close back above Friday's $4,038.20 high would invalidate the immediate continuation setup and make the $4,115.04 average the next recovery reference. Even that first improvement would leave gold below its $4,294.80 longer average, so it would take more than recovering one session's loss to repair the broader trend reading.
Silver's range ran from $48.895 to $52.315. The lower boundary is its first support test; the upper boundary is resistance, a level a recovery would need to overcome. A daily close above $52.315 would invalidate the immediate bearish continuation case, with the $57.01 average a further reference. A close below $48.895 would instead confirm a break of Friday's range.
Momentum adds a second distinction. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) measures the strength of recent price changes on a scale from zero to 100. On the 14 session setting, silver read 22.01 and gold 27.86. Both were below the conventional 30 threshold associated with oversold conditions. Silver's lower reading reinforces its weaker momentum, but neither number guarantees a rebound.
Oil Holds Above Both Averages

WTI's daily range was $102.43 to $104.99. The settlement above its $96.41 and $91.04 averages gives the upward trend case support from both periods. Its RSI of 68.89 also stood well above the metals' readings.
A daily close above $104.99 would establish a break above Friday's high. The opposite test is $102.43: a close below it would invalidate the immediate continuation case and shift attention towards the $96.41 average. That average is a reference from the observed data, not a promised destination after a break.
January Brent had a similar structure, with a $111.05 low and $114.29 high around its $113.43 settlement. A close above $114.29 would support continuation; a close below $111.05 would invalidate that immediate setup. Its 20 session average was $105.35. Brent's RSI of 73.49 exceeded the conventional 70 threshold associated with overbought conditions, showing stronger momentum alongside a more stretched reading.
The International Energy Agency's 14th October oil market report supplies dated physical market context. It reported Gulf crude exports recovering to 13.9 million barrels a day in September, while warning that attacks on infrastructure and tanker traffic threatened further gains. It also forecast weaker annual demand alongside a deficit through year end. That combination allows improving supply and continuing scarcity to coexist; it does not establish the cause of Friday's gains.
US Shares Need To Recover Their Lost Ground
The S&P 500 (SPX) finished below both averages, but its 20 session average remained above its 50 session average. Gold and silver had the opposite ordering. The broad equity index therefore showed a weaker close without the same downward ordering across both trend measures.
For the S&P 500, Friday's 7,527.56 low is the first downside reference. A close below it would establish a break of Friday's range; a close above the 7,637.48 high would weaken the immediate bearish case. The recorded 50 session average at 7,697.08 would then come before the 20 session average at 7,729.90 as recovery references.
The Nasdaq's larger daily loss came with a lower RSI, 34.74 against the S&P 500's 40.11. Its nearest range boundaries were 25,177.33 and 25,673.00. A daily close through either boundary would distinguish renewed selling from a recovery attempt. The Dow's 45.17 RSI was stronger than both, although its close also remained below both averages.
Company Results Show Uneven Growth
Company results add context without proving what drove the index moves. Amazon's 29th October earnings release reported quarterly cloud sales of $46 billion, up 39.3%, alongside a $42.4 billion free cash outflow over twelve months. It attributed the cash deterioration chiefly to increased equipment and property purchases, mainly for artificial intelligence. Bored Node's report on Amazon's cash flow and cloud growth explains those different reporting periods.
Intel's third quarter earnings release, also published on 29th October, reported revenue of $16.5 billion, up 21% from a year earlier. Its data centre and artificial intelligence segment grew 78% to $7.3 billion, while its client computing and physical AI segment fell 5% to $8.1 billion. Growth therefore differed sharply within the same company.
Intel forecast fourth quarter revenue of $15 billion to $16 billion, below the third quarter total. Finance chief David Zinsner expected the personal computer slowdown to continue through at least the first half of 2027. Those are management's expectations, rather than confirmed future results.
Inflation And Labour Costs Give Different Signals
The Federal Reserve held its target range at 3.75% to 4% on 28th October, describing inflation as elevated. Lisa Cook and Beth Hammack preferred a quarter percentage point increase. The decision kept rates unchanged while recording disagreement in favour of tighter policy.
The 30th October Employment Cost Index release showed civilian compensation costs rising 0.8% in the third quarter, against 0.9% previously. Wages and salaries rose 0.7%, compared with 0.9%. Slower quarterly wage growth sat alongside September's 3.6% annual personal consumption expenditures inflation, reported by the Bureau of Economic Analysis on 29th October.
The BEA also recorded household spending rising 0.5% in dollars but less than 0.1% after inflation, while real disposable income fell 0.3%. Bored Node's report on inflation and household income examines that split. The documented pressure is that higher dollar spending produced almost no increase in consumption volume, even as some company revenues continued to grow.
Filed underFinance · Markets · Stock market · US market
Disclosure
This is a dated, conditional technical assessment, not investment advice.
How our stories are produced:Editorial policy


